Eswatini vs Serbia: Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per capita
Eswatini
1.06 m3 per person
in 2024
Serbia
1.07 m3 per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
19th
Serbia rank
18th
Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1.07 m3 per person against 1.06 m3 per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0.01 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 19th and Serbia ranks 18th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.996 m3 per person | 0.3697 m3 per person | 0.6262 m3 per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1.34 m3 per person | 1.04 m3 per person | 0.3027 m3 per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 1.06 m3 per person | 1.1 m3 per person | 0.0428 m3 per person | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per capita, Eswatini or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 1.07 m3 per person against 1.06 m3 per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per capita between Eswatini and Serbia?
- 0.01 m3 per person, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Serbia rank globally for roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 19th and Serbia ranks 18th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.