Luxembourg vs Pakistan: Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per capita
Luxembourg
0.1239 m3 per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0.1192 m3 per person
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
120th
Pakistan rank
121st
Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Luxembourg
- Pakistan
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.1239 m3 per person against 0.1192 m3 per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0047 m3 per person.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 120th and Pakistan ranks 121st of 170 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2799 m3 per person | 0.1757 m3 per person | 0.1042 m3 per person | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.2821 m3 per person | 0.1438 m3 per person | 0.1383 m3 per person | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0.1348 m3 per person | 0.1236 m3 per person | 0.0112 m3 per person | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per capita, Luxembourg or Pakistan?
- Luxembourg, at 0.1239 m3 per person against 0.1192 m3 per person in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per capita between Luxembourg and Pakistan?
- 0.0047 m3 per person, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Pakistan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Pakistan rank globally for roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per capita?
- Luxembourg ranks 120th and Pakistan ranks 121st of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.