El Salvador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre

El Salvador
227.62 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
146.72 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
5th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
8th

Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Sao Tome and Principe
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 227.62 m3 per square kilometre against 146.72 m3 per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 80.9 m3 per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.6 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 5th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 8th of 170 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 131.17 m3 per square kilometre 54.85 m3 per square kilometre 76.32 m3 per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 151.93 m3 per square kilometre 64.7 m3 per square kilometre 87.23 m3 per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 170.46 m3 per square kilometre 79.34 m3 per square kilometre 91.12 m3 per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 212.17 m3 per square kilometre 100.47 m3 per square kilometre 111.7 m3 per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 239.2 m3 per square kilometre 116.03 m3 per square kilometre 123.17 m3 per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 234.1 m3 per square kilometre 138.53 m3 per square kilometre 95.57 m3 per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 228.81 m3 per square kilometre 145.74 m3 per square kilometre 83.07 m3 per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per square kilometre, El Salvador or Sao Tome and Principe?
El Salvador, at 227.62 m3 per square kilometre against 146.72 m3 per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per square kilometre between El Salvador and Sao Tome and Principe?
80.9 m3 per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 5th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 8th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/roundwood-non-coniferous-production-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/roundwood-non-coniferous-production-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sao-tome-and-principe/">El Salvador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
m3 per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,517 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.