Mauritius vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre

Mauritius
1.44 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
1.35 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
144th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
146th

Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 1.44 m3 per square kilometre against 1.35 m3 per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.09 m3 per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 144th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 146th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 26.82 m3 per square kilometre 0.1723 m3 per square kilometre 26.65 m3 per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 15.52 m3 per square kilometre 0.2065 m3 per square kilometre 15.31 m3 per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 11.51 m3 per square kilometre 0.3277 m3 per square kilometre 11.18 m3 per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 3.35 m3 per square kilometre 0.5616 m3 per square kilometre 2.78 m3 per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 2.79 m3 per square kilometre 0.8306 m3 per square kilometre 1.96 m3 per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 1.11 m3 per square kilometre 1.17 m3 per square kilometre 0.0648 m3 per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 1.44 m3 per square kilometre 1.31 m3 per square kilometre 0.126 m3 per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per square kilometre, Mauritius or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Mauritius, at 1.44 m3 per square kilometre against 1.35 m3 per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per square kilometre between Mauritius and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.09 m3 per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 144th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 146th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/roundwood-non-coniferous-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/roundwood-non-coniferous-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Mauritius vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
m3 per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,517 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.