Rwanda vs Sudan: Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP
Rwanda
0.0004 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sudan
0.0003 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Rwanda rank
24th
Sudan rank
26th
Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Rwanda
- Sudan
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.0004 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 m3 per US$ of GDP in Sudan, a difference of 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 24th and Sudan ranks 26th of 167 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0007 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 m3 per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0.0005 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per unit of gdp, Rwanda or Sudan?
- Rwanda, at 0.0004 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 m3 per US$ of GDP in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per unit of gdp between Rwanda and Sudan?
- 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Sudan rank globally for roundwood, non-coniferous — production, per unit of gdp?
- Rwanda ranks 24th and Sudan ranks 26th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood, non-coniferous — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.