Croatia vs Guatemala: Roundwood — Production, per capita
Croatia
1.41 m3 per person
in 2024
Guatemala
1.42 m3 per person
in 2024
Croatia rank
28th
Guatemala rank
27th
Roundwood — Production, per capita over time
- Croatia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 1.42 m3 per person against 1.41 m3 per person in Croatia, a difference of 0.01 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Guatemala ahead.
Croatia ranks 28th and Guatemala ranks 27th of 170 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6112 m3 per person | 1.29 m3 per person | 0.6836 m3 per person | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 0.9224 m3 per person | 1.28 m3 per person | 0.3569 m3 per person | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 1.26 m3 per person | 1.29 m3 per person | 0.0225 m3 per person | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 1.35 m3 per person | 1.39 m3 per person | 0.0376 m3 per person | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood — production, per capita, Croatia or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 1.42 m3 per person against 1.41 m3 per person in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood — production, per capita between Croatia and Guatemala?
- 0.01 m3 per person, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Guatemala?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Guatemala rank globally for roundwood — production, per capita?
- Croatia ranks 28th and Guatemala ranks 27th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.