Lithuania vs Norway: Roundwood — Production, per capita
Lithuania
2.65 m3 per person
in 2024
Norway
2.59 m3 per person
in 2024
Lithuania rank
11th
Norway rank
12th
Roundwood — Production, per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Norway
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 2.65 m3 per person against 2.59 m3 per person in Norway, a difference of 0.06 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Norway ahead.
Lithuania ranks 11th and Norway ranks 12th of 170 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.32 m3 per person | 2.03 m3 per person | 0.7118 m3 per person | Norway |
| 2000s | 1.76 m3 per person | 1.99 m3 per person | 0.2219 m3 per person | Norway |
| 2010s | 2.36 m3 per person | 2.26 m3 per person | 0.0979 m3 per person | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 2.46 m3 per person | 2.43 m3 per person | 0.0328 m3 per person | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood — production, per capita, Lithuania or Norway?
- Lithuania, at 2.65 m3 per person against 2.59 m3 per person in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood — production, per capita between Lithuania and Norway?
- 0.06 m3 per person, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Norway?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Norway rank globally for roundwood — production, per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 11th and Norway ranks 12th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.