Guyana vs Poland: Roundwood — Production, per unit of GDP
Guyana
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Poland
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Guyana rank
88th
Poland rank
91st
Roundwood — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Guyana
- Poland
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Poland, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 88th and Poland ranks 91st of 167 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0023 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0021 m3 per US$ of GDP | Guyana |
| 2000s | 0.0012 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0011 m3 per US$ of GDP | Guyana |
| 2010s | 0.0003 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 m3 per US$ of GDP | Guyana |
| 2020s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood — production, per unit of gdp, Guyana or Poland?
- Guyana, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Poland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood — production, per unit of gdp between Guyana and Poland?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Poland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Guyana and Poland rank globally for roundwood — production, per unit of gdp?
- Guyana ranks 88th and Poland ranks 91st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.