Pakistan vs Serbia: Roundwood — Production, per unit of GDP
Pakistan
0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Serbia
0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Pakistan rank
70th
Serbia rank
71st
Roundwood — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Pakistan
- Serbia
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP in Serbia, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 70th and Serbia ranks 71st of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0002 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roundwood — production, per unit of gdp, Pakistan or Serbia?
- Pakistan, at 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roundwood — production, per unit of gdp between Pakistan and Serbia?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Pakistan and Serbia rank globally for roundwood — production, per unit of gdp?
- Pakistan ranks 70th and Serbia ranks 71st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roundwood — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roundwood — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.