Botswana vs Congo: Rural population density

Botswana
300.97 rural population per sq. km of arable land
in 2011
Congo
300.96 rural population per sq. km of arable land
in 2011
Botswana rank
26th
Congo rank
27th

Rural population density over time

  • Botswana
  • Congo
100200300400196119862011

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 300.97 rural population per sq. km of arable land against 300.96 rural population per sq. km of arable land in Congo, a difference of 0.01 rural population per sq. km of arable land.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Botswana ranks 26th and Congo ranks 27th of 53 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 142.97 rural population per sq. km of arable land 144.6 rural population per sq. km of arable land 1.62 rural population per sq. km of arable land Congo
1970s 179.2 rural population per sq. km of arable land 169.28 rural population per sq. km of arable land 9.92 rural population per sq. km of arable land Botswana
1980s 208.24 rural population per sq. km of arable land 196.03 rural population per sq. km of arable land 12.22 rural population per sq. km of arable land Botswana
1990s 266.46 rural population per sq. km of arable land 244.86 rural population per sq. km of arable land 21.6 rural population per sq. km of arable land Botswana
2000s 345.2 rural population per sq. km of arable land 280.05 rural population per sq. km of arable land 65.15 rural population per sq. km of arable land Botswana
2010s 301.67 rural population per sq. km of arable land 299.17 rural population per sq. km of arable land 2.51 rural population per sq. km of arable land Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rural population density, Botswana or Congo?
Botswana, at 300.97 rural population per sq. km of arable land against 300.96 rural population per sq. km of arable land in Congo as of 2011.
What is the difference in rural population density between Botswana and Congo?
0.01 rural population per sq. km of arable land, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo?
51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
How do Botswana and Congo rank globally for rural population density?
Botswana ranks 26th and Congo ranks 27th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization and World Bank population estimates, published as Rural population density (rural population per sq. km of arable land). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Congo: Rural population density. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization and World Bank population estimates. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/rural-population-density-rural-population-per-sq-km-of-arable-land/botswana/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/rural-population-density-rural-population-per-sq-km-of-arable-land/botswana/congo-rep/">Botswana vs Congo: Rural population density</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rural population density (rural population per sq. km of arable land)
Unit
rural population per sq. km of arable land
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization and World Bank population estimates
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 2,977 data points, 1961–2011
Last refreshed

Rural population density is the rural population divided by the arable land area. Rural population is calculated as the difference between the total population and the urban population. Arable land includes land defined by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded.