Libya vs Sudan: Rural population density

Libya
81.72 rural population per sq. km of arable land
in 2011
Sudan
121.5 rural population per sq. km of arable land
in 2011
Libya rank
52nd
Sudan rank
50th

Rural population density over time

  • Libya
  • Sudan
0255075100125196119862011

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 121.5 rural population per sq. km of arable land against 81.72 rural population per sq. km of arable land in Libya, a difference of 39.78 rural population per sq. km of arable land.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.5 times Libya's.

Across all 51 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 52nd and Sudan ranks 50th of 53 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Sudan Difference Ahead
1960s 60.69 rural population per sq. km of arable land 73.65 rural population per sq. km of arable land 12.96 rural population per sq. km of arable land Sudan
1970s 54.49 rural population per sq. km of arable land 85.43 rural population per sq. km of arable land 30.93 rural population per sq. km of arable land Sudan
1980s 54.1 rural population per sq. km of arable land 106.51 rural population per sq. km of arable land 52.41 rural population per sq. km of arable land Sudan
1990s 61.06 rural population per sq. km of arable land 109.65 rural population per sq. km of arable land 48.59 rural population per sq. km of arable land Sudan
2000s 74.7 rural population per sq. km of arable land 113.47 rural population per sq. km of arable land 38.78 rural population per sq. km of arable land Sudan
2010s 81.6 rural population per sq. km of arable land 120.37 rural population per sq. km of arable land 38.77 rural population per sq. km of arable land Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rural population density, Libya or Sudan?
Sudan, at 121.5 rural population per sq. km of arable land against 81.72 rural population per sq. km of arable land in Libya as of 2011.
What is the difference in rural population density between Libya and Sudan?
39.78 rural population per sq. km of arable land, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sudan?
51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
How do Libya and Sudan rank globally for rural population density?
Libya ranks 52nd and Sudan ranks 50th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization and World Bank population estimates, published as Rural population density (rural population per sq. km of arable land). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Sudan: Rural population density. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization and World Bank population estimates. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/rural-population-density-rural-population-per-sq-km-of-arable-land/libya/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/rural-population-density-rural-population-per-sq-km-of-arable-land/libya/sudan/">Libya vs Sudan: Rural population density</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rural population density (rural population per sq. km of arable land)
Unit
rural population per sq. km of arable land
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization and World Bank population estimates
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 2,977 data points, 1961–2011
Last refreshed

Rural population density is the rural population divided by the arable land area. Rural population is calculated as the difference between the total population and the urban population. Arable land includes land defined by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded.