Armenia vs Bhutan: People in rural areas not using an improved water source
Armenia
0 people
in 2024
Bhutan
0 people
in 2024
Armenia rank
138th
Bhutan rank
138th
People in rural areas not using an improved water source over time
- Armenia
- Bhutan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Bhutan, a difference of 0 people.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bhutan ahead.
Armenia ranks 138th and Bhutan ranks 138th of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Bhutan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46,570 people | 63,606 people | 17,036 people | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 20,220 people | 18,570 people | 1,650 people | Armenia |
| 2020s | 5,116 people | 0 people | 5,116 people | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using an improved water source, Armenia or Bhutan?
- Armenia, at 0 people against 0 people in Bhutan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using an improved water source between Armenia and Bhutan?
- 0 people, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Bhutan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Bhutan rank globally for people in rural areas not using an improved water source?
- Armenia ranks 138th and Bhutan ranks 138th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using an improved water source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.