Armenia vs Tokelau: People in rural areas not using an improved water source
Armenia
0 people
in 2024
Tokelau
0 people
in 2024
Armenia rank
138th
Tokelau rank
138th
People in rural areas not using an improved water source over time
- Armenia
- Tokelau
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Tokelau, a difference of 0 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 138th and Tokelau ranks 138th of 178 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46,570 people | 36.69 people | 46,533 people | Armenia |
| 2010s | 20,220 people | 11.86 people | 20,208 people | Armenia |
| 2020s | 5,116 people | 0 people | 5,116 people | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using an improved water source, Armenia or Tokelau?
- Armenia, at 0 people against 0 people in Tokelau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using an improved water source between Armenia and Tokelau?
- 0 people, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Tokelau?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Tokelau rank globally for people in rural areas not using an improved water source?
- Armenia ranks 138th and Tokelau ranks 138th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using an improved water source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.