Belize vs Fiji: People in rural areas not using an improved water source
Belize
16,495 people
in 2024
Fiji
29,177 people
in 2024
Belize rank
108th
Fiji rank
105th
People in rural areas not using an improved water source over time
- Belize
- Fiji
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 29,177 people against 16,495 people in Belize, a difference of 12,682 people.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.8 times Belize's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Fiji has been ahead every year.
Belize ranks 108th and Fiji ranks 105th of 178 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16,018 people | 32,027 people | 16,009 people | Fiji |
| 2010s | 17,124 people | 31,256 people | 14,132 people | Fiji |
| 2020s | 16,522 people | 29,499 people | 12,977 people | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using an improved water source, Belize or Fiji?
- Fiji, at 29,177 people against 16,495 people in Belize as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using an improved water source between Belize and Fiji?
- 12,682 people, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Fiji?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belize and Fiji rank globally for people in rural areas not using an improved water source?
- Belize ranks 108th and Fiji ranks 105th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using an improved water source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.