Bhutan vs Luxembourg: People in rural areas not using an improved water source
Bhutan
0 people
in 2024
Luxembourg
0 people
in 2024
Bhutan rank
138th
Luxembourg rank
138th
People in rural areas not using an improved water source over time
- Bhutan
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 138th and Luxembourg ranks 138th of 178 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63,606 people | 0 people | 63,606 people | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 18,570 people | 0 people | 18,570 people | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0 people | 0 people | 0 people | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using an improved water source, Bhutan or Luxembourg?
- Bhutan, at 0 people against 0 people in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using an improved water source between Bhutan and Luxembourg?
- 0 people, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Luxembourg rank globally for people in rural areas not using an improved water source?
- Bhutan ranks 138th and Luxembourg ranks 138th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using an improved water source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.