Bhutan vs Paraguay: People in rural areas not using an improved water source
Bhutan
0 people
in 2024
Paraguay
0 people
in 2024
Bhutan rank
138th
Paraguay rank
138th
People in rural areas not using an improved water source over time
- Bhutan
- Paraguay
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Paraguay, a difference of 0 people.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 138th and Paraguay ranks 138th of 178 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63,606 people | 795,834 people | 732,227 people | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 18,570 people | 296,801 people | 278,231 people | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 0 people | 1,315 people | 1,315 people | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using an improved water source, Bhutan or Paraguay?
- Bhutan, at 0 people against 0 people in Paraguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using an improved water source between Bhutan and Paraguay?
- 0 people, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Paraguay?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Paraguay rank globally for people in rural areas not using an improved water source?
- Bhutan ranks 138th and Paraguay ranks 138th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using an improved water source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.