Croatia vs Lithuania: People in rural areas not using an improved water source
Croatia
2,352 people
in 2024
Lithuania
2,339 people
in 2024
Croatia rank
120th
Lithuania rank
121st
People in rural areas not using an improved water source over time
- Croatia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 2,352 people against 2,339 people in Lithuania, a difference of 13 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.
Croatia ranks 120th and Lithuania ranks 121st of 178 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41,199 people | 223,097 people | 181,898 people | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 5,356 people | 90,753 people | 85,397 people | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 2,415 people | 13,755 people | 11,340 people | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using an improved water source, Croatia or Lithuania?
- Croatia, at 2,352 people against 2,339 people in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using an improved water source between Croatia and Lithuania?
- 13 people, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Lithuania?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Lithuania rank globally for people in rural areas not using an improved water source?
- Croatia ranks 120th and Lithuania ranks 121st of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using an improved water source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.