Guyana vs Jordan: People in rural areas not using an improved water source
Guyana
14,433 people
in 2024
Jordan
12,777 people
in 2024
Guyana rank
109th
Jordan rank
110th
People in rural areas not using an improved water source over time
- Guyana
- Jordan
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 14,433 people against 12,777 people in Jordan, a difference of 1,656 people.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 109th and Jordan ranks 110th of 178 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53,390 people | 33,856 people | 19,535 people | Guyana |
| 2010s | 30,950 people | 19,618 people | 11,332 people | Guyana |
| 2020s | 15,797 people | 14,365 people | 1,432 people | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using an improved water source, Guyana or Jordan?
- Guyana, at 14,433 people against 12,777 people in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using an improved water source between Guyana and Jordan?
- 1,656 people, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Jordan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Guyana and Jordan rank globally for people in rural areas not using an improved water source?
- Guyana ranks 109th and Jordan ranks 110th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using an improved water source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of people not using improved drinking water sources. These people might use surface water sources or unprotected springs or wells, as no safe and reliable improved drinking water source is available to them.