Lesotho vs Pakistan: Sawlogs and veneer logs, coniferous — Production, per capita
Lesotho
0.006 m3 per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0058 m3 per person
in 2024
Lesotho rank
76th
Pakistan rank
77th
Sawlogs and veneer logs, coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Lesotho
- Pakistan
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0.006 m3 per person against 0.0058 m3 per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0002 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Pakistan ahead.
Lesotho ranks 76th and Pakistan ranks 77th of 122 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0058 m3 per person | 0.0064 m3 per person | 0.0006 m3 per person | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.0061 m3 per person | 0.006 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawlogs and veneer logs, coniferous — production, per capita, Lesotho or Pakistan?
- Lesotho, at 0.006 m3 per person against 0.0058 m3 per person in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawlogs and veneer logs, coniferous — production, per capita between Lesotho and Pakistan?
- 0.0002 m3 per person, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Pakistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Lesotho and Pakistan rank globally for sawlogs and veneer logs, coniferous — production, per capita?
- Lesotho ranks 76th and Pakistan ranks 77th of 122 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawlogs and veneer logs, coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawlogs and veneer logs, coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.