Chile vs Sudan: Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per capita
Chile
0.0078 m3 per person
in 2024
Sudan
0.0071 m3 per person
in 2024
Chile rank
90th
Sudan rank
93rd
Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Chile
- Sudan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.0078 m3 per person against 0.0071 m3 per person in Sudan, a difference of 0.0007 m3 per person.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 90th and Sudan ranks 93rd of 144 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0341 m3 per person | 0.0075 m3 per person | 0.0266 m3 per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.0125 m3 per person | 0.0074 m3 per person | 0.0052 m3 per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per capita, Chile or Sudan?
- Chile, at 0.0078 m3 per person against 0.0071 m3 per person in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per capita between Chile and Sudan?
- 0.0007 m3 per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Sudan rank globally for sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per capita?
- Chile ranks 90th and Sudan ranks 93rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.