Italy vs Sudan: Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per capita
Italy
0.0076 m3 per person
in 2024
Sudan
0.0071 m3 per person
in 2024
Italy rank
92nd
Sudan rank
93rd
Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Italy
- Sudan
How they compare
Italy currently reports 0.0076 m3 per person against 0.0071 m3 per person in Sudan, a difference of 0.0005 m3 per person.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Italy ranks 92nd and Sudan ranks 93rd of 144 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0099 m3 per person | 0.0075 m3 per person | 0.0024 m3 per person | Italy |
| 2020s | 0.0087 m3 per person | 0.0074 m3 per person | 0.0013 m3 per person | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per capita, Italy or Sudan?
- Italy, at 0.0076 m3 per person against 0.0071 m3 per person in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per capita between Italy and Sudan?
- 0.0005 m3 per person, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Italy and Sudan rank globally for sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per capita?
- Italy ranks 92nd and Sudan ranks 93rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.