Equatorial Guinea vs Rwanda: Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per square

Equatorial Guinea
46.35 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
35.02 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
2nd
Rwanda rank
4th

Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per square over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Rwanda
01020304050196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 46.35 m3 per square kilometre against 35.02 m3 per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 11.33 m3 per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 2nd and Rwanda ranks 4th of 144 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 15.68 m3 per square kilometre 0.1847 m3 per square kilometre 15.5 m3 per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 3.07 m3 per square kilometre 0.4216 m3 per square kilometre 2.64 m3 per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 4.68 m3 per square kilometre 1.09 m3 per square kilometre 3.59 m3 per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 13.34 m3 per square kilometre 2.07 m3 per square kilometre 11.28 m3 per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 19.94 m3 per square kilometre 11.58 m3 per square kilometre 8.37 m3 per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 26.95 m3 per square kilometre 35.02 m3 per square kilometre 8.07 m3 per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 46.35 m3 per square kilometre 35.02 m3 per square kilometre 11.33 m3 per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per square, Equatorial Guinea or Rwanda?
Equatorial Guinea, at 46.35 m3 per square kilometre against 35.02 m3 per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per square between Equatorial Guinea and Rwanda?
11.33 m3 per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Rwanda rank globally for sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per square?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 2nd and Rwanda ranks 4th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Rwanda: Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawlogs-and-veneer-logs-non-coniferous-production-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawlogs-and-veneer-logs-non-coniferous-production-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/rwanda/">Equatorial Guinea vs Rwanda: Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
m3 per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
145 places, 7,773 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.