Rwanda vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per square

Rwanda
35.02 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
31.54 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
4th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
7th

Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per square over time

  • Rwanda
  • Trinidad and Tobago
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 35.02 m3 per square kilometre against 31.54 m3 per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 3.48 m3 per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Rwanda ranks 4th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 7th of 144 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1847 m3 per square kilometre 18.02 m3 per square kilometre 17.84 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.4216 m3 per square kilometre 16.18 m3 per square kilometre 15.76 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 1.09 m3 per square kilometre 9.47 m3 per square kilometre 8.38 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 2.07 m3 per square kilometre 9.92 m3 per square kilometre 7.85 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 11.58 m3 per square kilometre 9.9 m3 per square kilometre 1.67 m3 per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 35.02 m3 per square kilometre 23.6 m3 per square kilometre 11.42 m3 per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 35.02 m3 per square kilometre 31.54 m3 per square kilometre 3.48 m3 per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per square, Rwanda or Trinidad and Tobago?
Rwanda, at 35.02 m3 per square kilometre against 31.54 m3 per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per square between Rwanda and Trinidad and Tobago?
3.48 m3 per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per square?
Rwanda ranks 4th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 7th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawlogs-and-veneer-logs-non-coniferous-production-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawlogs-and-veneer-logs-non-coniferous-production-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/trinidad-and-tobago/">Rwanda vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
m3 per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
145 places, 7,773 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.