Costa Rica vs Serbia: Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per capita
Costa Rica
0.1659 m3 per person
in 2024
Serbia
0.1514 m3 per person
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
42nd
Serbia rank
45th
Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per capita over time
- Costa Rica
- Serbia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0.1659 m3 per person against 0.1514 m3 per person in Serbia, a difference of 0.0145 m3 per person.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 42nd and Serbia ranks 45th of 145 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2692 m3 per person | 0.1675 m3 per person | 0.1017 m3 per person | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0.2266 m3 per person | 0.1677 m3 per person | 0.059 m3 per person | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0.1742 m3 per person | 0.164 m3 per person | 0.0102 m3 per person | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per capita, Costa Rica or Serbia?
- Costa Rica, at 0.1659 m3 per person against 0.1514 m3 per person in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per capita between Costa Rica and Serbia?
- 0.0145 m3 per person, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Serbia rank globally for sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per capita?
- Costa Rica ranks 42nd and Serbia ranks 45th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.