Czechia vs Montenegro: Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per capita
Czechia
0.8713 m3 per person
in 2024
Montenegro
0.8532 m3 per person
in 2024
Czechia rank
15th
Montenegro rank
16th
Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per capita over time
- Czechia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.8713 m3 per person against 0.8532 m3 per person in Montenegro, a difference of 0.0181 m3 per person.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 15th and Montenegro ranks 16th of 145 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.9221 m3 per person | 0.2884 m3 per person | 0.6337 m3 per person | Czechia |
| 2010s | 1.03 m3 per person | 0.4567 m3 per person | 0.569 m3 per person | Czechia |
| 2020s | 1.33 m3 per person | 0.8691 m3 per person | 0.4586 m3 per person | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per capita, Czechia or Montenegro?
- Czechia, at 0.8713 m3 per person against 0.8532 m3 per person in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per capita between Czechia and Montenegro?
- 0.0181 m3 per person, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Montenegro?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Montenegro rank globally for sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per capita?
- Czechia ranks 15th and Montenegro ranks 16th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.