Estonia vs Latvia: Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per capita
Estonia
2.6 m3 per person
in 2024
Latvia
2.95 m3 per person
in 2024
Estonia rank
6th
Latvia rank
5th
Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per capita over time
- Estonia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 2.95 m3 per person against 2.6 m3 per person in Estonia, a difference of 0.35 m3 per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 6th and Latvia ranks 5th of 145 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9779 m3 per person | 1.33 m3 per person | 0.3562 m3 per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 2.18 m3 per person | 3.27 m3 per person | 1.1 m3 per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 3 m3 per person | 3.6 m3 per person | 0.6035 m3 per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 2.99 m3 per person | 3.64 m3 per person | 0.6558 m3 per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per capita, Estonia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 2.95 m3 per person against 2.6 m3 per person in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per capita between Estonia and Latvia?
- 0.35 m3 per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Latvia rank globally for sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per capita?
- Estonia ranks 6th and Latvia ranks 5th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.