Iceland vs Jamaica: Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per capita
Iceland
0 m3 per person
in 2024
Jamaica
0.0003 m3 per person
in 2024
Iceland rank
139th
Jamaica rank
136th
Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per capita over time
- Iceland
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0.0003 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Iceland, a difference of 0.0003 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Jamaica ahead.
Iceland ranks 139th and Jamaica ranks 136th of 145 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Jamaica in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 m3 per person | 0.0511 m3 per person | 0.0511 m3 per person | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 0 m3 per person | 0.0104 m3 per person | 0.0104 m3 per person | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 0.0008 m3 per person | 0.0004 m3 per person | 0.0004 m3 per person | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.0001 m3 per person | 0.0003 m3 per person | 0.0002 m3 per person | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per capita, Iceland or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 0.0003 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per capita between Iceland and Jamaica?
- 0.0003 m3 per person, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Jamaica?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Jamaica rank globally for sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per capita?
- Iceland ranks 139th and Jamaica ranks 136th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.