Central African Republic vs Nicaragua: Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per square kilometre

Central African Republic
0.8615 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.7313 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
103rd
Nicaragua rank
106th

Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Nicaragua
0246196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.8615 m3 per square kilometre against 0.7313 m3 per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.1302 m3 per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.2 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 103rd and Nicaragua ranks 106th of 145 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0.267 m3 per square kilometre 2.47 m3 per square kilometre 2.21 m3 per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 0.6215 m3 per square kilometre 6.05 m3 per square kilometre 5.43 m3 per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 0.396 m3 per square kilometre 4.01 m3 per square kilometre 3.61 m3 per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 0.5052 m3 per square kilometre 1.57 m3 per square kilometre 1.06 m3 per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 0.8781 m3 per square kilometre 0.9108 m3 per square kilometre 0.0327 m3 per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 0.6573 m3 per square kilometre 1 m3 per square kilometre 0.345 m3 per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 0.8615 m3 per square kilometre 0.8224 m3 per square kilometre 0.0391 m3 per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Nicaragua?
Central African Republic, at 0.8615 m3 per square kilometre against 0.7313 m3 per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Nicaragua?
0.1302 m3 per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Nicaragua rank globally for sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 103rd and Nicaragua ranks 106th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Nicaragua: Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawlogs-and-veneer-logs-production-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawlogs-and-veneer-logs-production-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/nicaragua/">Central African Republic vs Nicaragua: Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
m3 per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
146 places, 7,887 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.