Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per square kilometre

Guatemala
31.5 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
25 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
28th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
31st

Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 31.5 m3 per square kilometre against 25 m3 per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 6.5 m3 per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.3 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Guatemala ranks 28th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 145 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 4.13 m3 per square kilometre 7.71 m3 per square kilometre 3.58 m3 per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 4.19 m3 per square kilometre 6.77 m3 per square kilometre 2.58 m3 per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 1.49 m3 per square kilometre 6.98 m3 per square kilometre 5.49 m3 per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 3.54 m3 per square kilometre 9.58 m3 per square kilometre 6.04 m3 per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 4.31 m3 per square kilometre 10.42 m3 per square kilometre 6.11 m3 per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 6.17 m3 per square kilometre 25 m3 per square kilometre 18.83 m3 per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 22.29 m3 per square kilometre 25 m3 per square kilometre 2.71 m3 per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per square kilometre, Guatemala or Sao Tome and Principe?
Guatemala, at 31.5 m3 per square kilometre against 25 m3 per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per square kilometre between Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe?
6.5 m3 per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 28th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawlogs-and-veneer-logs-production-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawlogs-and-veneer-logs-production-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sao-tome-and-principe/">Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
m3 per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
146 places, 7,887 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.