Belgium vs Gambia: Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per unit of GDP
Belgium
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Gambia
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Belgium rank
91st
Gambia rank
93rd
Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Belgium
- Gambia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Gambia, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Gambia ahead.
Belgium ranks 91st and Gambia ranks 93rd of 144 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | Gambia |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per unit of gdp, Belgium or Gambia?
- Belgium, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Gambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per unit of gdp between Belgium and Gambia?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Gambia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Gambia rank globally for sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per unit of gdp?
- Belgium ranks 91st and Gambia ranks 93rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.