Egypt vs Eritrea: Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per unit of GDP
Egypt
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Egypt rank
129th
Eritrea rank
126th
Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Egypt
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Egypt, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.4 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Eritrea ahead.
Egypt ranks 129th and Eritrea ranks 126th of 144 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per unit of gdp, Egypt or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Egypt as of 2011.
- What is the difference in sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per unit of gdp between Egypt and Eritrea?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Eritrea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Egypt and Eritrea rank globally for sawlogs and veneer logs — production, per unit of gdp?
- Egypt ranks 129th and Eritrea ranks 126th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.