Australia and New Zealand vs Viet Nam: Sawnwood, coniferous — Import quantity, annual growth rate

Australia and New Zealand
19.05 % change on previous year
in 2024
Viet Nam
16.52 % change on previous year
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
66th
Viet Nam rank
69th

Sawnwood, coniferous — Import quantity, annual growth rate over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Viet Nam
0200400600800196219932024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 19.05 % change on previous year against 16.52 % change on previous year in Viet Nam, a difference of 2.53 % change on previous year.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Viet Nam's.

The two have swapped places 27 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Viet Nam ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 66th and Viet Nam ranks 69th of 237 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Viet Nam Difference Ahead
1970s 2.06 % change on previous year 8.58 % change on previous year 6.51 % change on previous year Viet Nam
1980s 9.7 % change on previous year 59.96 % change on previous year 50.26 % change on previous year Viet Nam
1990s -2.47 % change on previous year 101.12 % change on previous year 103.58 % change on previous year Viet Nam
2000s -0.2789 % change on previous year 37.61 % change on previous year 37.89 % change on previous year Viet Nam
2010s 5.54 % change on previous year 8.87 % change on previous year 3.33 % change on previous year Viet Nam
2020s 9.02 % change on previous year -0.5855 % change on previous year 9.61 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sawnwood, coniferous — import quantity, annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or Viet Nam?
Australia and New Zealand, at 19.05 % change on previous year against 16.52 % change on previous year in Viet Nam as of 2024.
What is the difference in sawnwood, coniferous — import quantity, annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and Viet Nam?
2.53 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Viet Nam?
47 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Viet Nam rank globally for sawnwood, coniferous — import quantity, annual growth rate?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 66th and Viet Nam ranks 69th of 237 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, coniferous — Import quantity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Viet Nam: Sawnwood, coniferous — Import quantity, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawnwood-coniferous-import-quantity-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/viet-nam-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawnwood-coniferous-import-quantity-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/viet-nam-2/">Australia and New Zealand vs Viet Nam: Sawnwood, coniferous — Import quantity, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sawnwood, coniferous — Import quantity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
267 places, 11,449 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sawnwood, coniferous — Import quantity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.