Brazil vs Chile: Sawnwood, coniferous — Import quantity, per capita
Brazil
0.0001 m3 per person
in 2024
Chile
0.0001 m3 per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
150th
Chile rank
151st
Sawnwood, coniferous — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Chile
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0.0001 m3 per person against 0.0001 m3 per person in Chile, a difference of 0 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chile ahead.
Brazil ranks 150th and Chile ranks 151st of 184 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 m3 per person | 0.0002 m3 per person | 0.0002 m3 per person | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.0002 m3 per person | 0.0013 m3 per person | 0.0011 m3 per person | Chile |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per person | 0.001 m3 per person | 0.0009 m3 per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.0001 m3 per person | 0.0003 m3 per person | 0.0002 m3 per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood, coniferous — import quantity, per capita, Brazil or Chile?
- Brazil, at 0.0001 m3 per person against 0.0001 m3 per person in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood, coniferous — import quantity, per capita between Brazil and Chile?
- 0 m3 per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Chile?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Chile rank globally for sawnwood, coniferous — import quantity, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 150th and Chile ranks 151st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, coniferous — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood, coniferous — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.