South Sudan vs Zambia: Sawnwood, coniferous — Import value, per capita
South Sudan
0 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Zambia
0 1000 USD per person
in 2024
South Sudan rank
152nd
Zambia rank
154th
Sawnwood, coniferous — Import value, per capita over time
- South Sudan
- Zambia
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 1000 USD per person against 0 1000 USD per person in Zambia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per person.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.9 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Zambia ahead.
South Sudan ranks 152nd and Zambia ranks 154th of 184 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0003 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | 0.0002 1000 USD per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood, coniferous — import value, per capita, South Sudan or Zambia?
- South Sudan, at 0 1000 USD per person against 0 1000 USD per person in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood, coniferous — import value, per capita between South Sudan and Zambia?
- 0 1000 USD per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zambia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Zambia rank globally for sawnwood, coniferous — import value, per capita?
- South Sudan ranks 152nd and Zambia ranks 154th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, coniferous — Import value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood, coniferous — Import value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.