Eritrea vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Sawnwood — Export quantity, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea rank
146th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
146th
Sawnwood — Export quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 146th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 146th of 180 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood — export quantity, per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Eritrea, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2011.
- What is the difference in sawnwood — export quantity, per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for sawnwood — export quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 146th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 146th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood — Export quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood — Export quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.