Libya vs Tuvalu: Sawnwood — Export value, per square kilometre
Libya
0 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
0 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
140th
Tuvalu rank
140th
Sawnwood — Export value, per square kilometre over time
- Libya
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0 1000 USD per square kilometre in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 1000 USD per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Libya ranks 140th and Tuvalu ranks 140th of 183 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1 1000 USD per square kilometre | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0417 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0417 1000 USD per square kilometre | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood — export value, per square kilometre, Libya or Tuvalu?
- Libya, at 0 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0 1000 USD per square kilometre in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sawnwood — export value, per square kilometre between Libya and Tuvalu?
- 0 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Tuvalu?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Tuvalu rank globally for sawnwood — export value, per square kilometre?
- Libya ranks 140th and Tuvalu ranks 140th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood — Export value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood — Export value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.