Italy vs Luxembourg: Sawnwood — Export value, per unit of GDP
Italy
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Luxembourg
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Italy rank
66th
Luxembourg rank
63rd
Sawnwood — Export value, per unit of GDP over time
- Italy
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Italy, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Italy ranks 66th and Luxembourg ranks 63rd of 180 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood — export value, per unit of gdp, Italy or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Italy as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood — export value, per unit of gdp between Italy and Luxembourg?
- 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Italy and Luxembourg rank globally for sawnwood — export value, per unit of gdp?
- Italy ranks 66th and Luxembourg ranks 63rd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood — Export value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood — Export value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.