China vs Montenegro: Sawnwood — Import value, per capita
China
0.0051 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Montenegro
0.005 1000 USD per person
in 2024
China rank
91st
Montenegro rank
92nd
Sawnwood — Import value, per capita over time
- China
- Montenegro
How they compare
China currently reports 0.0051 1000 USD per person against 0.005 1000 USD per person in Montenegro, a difference of 0.0001 1000 USD per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was China ahead.
China ranks 91st and Montenegro ranks 92nd of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0018 1000 USD per person | 0.003 1000 USD per person | 0.0012 1000 USD per person | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0.0057 1000 USD per person | 0.0024 1000 USD per person | 0.0032 1000 USD per person | China |
| 2020s | 0.0055 1000 USD per person | 0.0036 1000 USD per person | 0.0019 1000 USD per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood — import value, per capita, China or Montenegro?
- China, at 0.0051 1000 USD per person against 0.005 1000 USD per person in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood — import value, per capita between China and Montenegro?
- 0.0001 1000 USD per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Montenegro?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do China and Montenegro rank globally for sawnwood — import value, per capita?
- China ranks 91st and Montenegro ranks 92nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood — Import value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood — Import value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.