Namibia vs Singapore: Sawnwood — Import value, per capita
Namibia
0.0047 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Singapore
0.0046 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Namibia rank
96th
Singapore rank
97th
Sawnwood — Import value, per capita over time
- Namibia
- Singapore
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.0047 1000 USD per person against 0.0046 1000 USD per person in Singapore, a difference of 0.0001 1000 USD per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Singapore ahead.
Namibia ranks 96th and Singapore ranks 97th of 184 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0028 1000 USD per person | 0.0234 1000 USD per person | 0.0206 1000 USD per person | Singapore |
| 2010s | 0.0054 1000 USD per person | 0.0142 1000 USD per person | 0.0088 1000 USD per person | Singapore |
| 2020s | 0.0046 1000 USD per person | 0.0072 1000 USD per person | 0.0026 1000 USD per person | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood — import value, per capita, Namibia or Singapore?
- Namibia, at 0.0047 1000 USD per person against 0.0046 1000 USD per person in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood — import value, per capita between Namibia and Singapore?
- 0.0001 1000 USD per person, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Singapore?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Singapore rank globally for sawnwood — import value, per capita?
- Namibia ranks 96th and Singapore ranks 97th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood — Import value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood — Import value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.