Eritrea vs Mongolia: Sawnwood — Import value, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Mongolia
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea rank
164th
Mongolia rank
165th
Sawnwood — Import value, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Mongolia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Mongolia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 164th and Mongolia ranks 165th of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood — import value, per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Mongolia?
- Eritrea, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Mongolia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in sawnwood — import value, per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Mongolia?
- 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Mongolia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Mongolia rank globally for sawnwood — import value, per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 164th and Mongolia ranks 165th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood — Import value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood — Import value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.