Norway vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity, per square kilometre

Norway
0.0137 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.016 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
83rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
81st

Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity, per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.016 m3 per square kilometre against 0.0137 m3 per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0023 m3 per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Norway ranks 83rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 81st of 183 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 m3 per square kilometre 0.1689 m3 per square kilometre 0.1683 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0013 m3 per square kilometre 0.1267 m3 per square kilometre 0.1254 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.0113 m3 per square kilometre 0.2203 m3 per square kilometre 0.209 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0078 m3 per square kilometre 0.1486 m3 per square kilometre 0.1408 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0068 m3 per square kilometre 0.149 m3 per square kilometre 0.1422 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0098 m3 per square kilometre 0.1664 m3 per square kilometre 0.1566 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.0163 m3 per square kilometre 0.0313 m3 per square kilometre 0.0151 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sawnwood, non-coniferous — export quantity, per square kilometre, Norway or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.016 m3 per square kilometre against 0.0137 m3 per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — export quantity, per square kilometre between Norway and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0023 m3 per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for sawnwood, non-coniferous — export quantity, per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 83rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 81st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawnwood-non-coniferous-export-quantity-per-square-kilometre/norway/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawnwood-non-coniferous-export-quantity-per-square-kilometre/norway/trinidad-and-tobago/">Norway vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity, per square kilometre
Unit
m3 per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 7,353 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.