Eritrea vs Jordan: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Jordan
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea rank
132nd
Jordan rank
131st
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Eritrea, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Jordan ahead.
Eritrea ranks 132nd and Jordan ranks 131st of 180 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood, non-coniferous — export quantity, per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — export quantity, per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Jordan?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Jordan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Jordan rank globally for sawnwood, non-coniferous — export quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 132nd and Jordan ranks 131st of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.