Jordan vs Libya: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity, per unit of GDP
Jordan
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Libya
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Jordan rank
131st
Libya rank
132nd
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- Jordan
- Libya
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Libya, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 131st and Libya ranks 132nd of 180 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood, non-coniferous — export quantity, per unit of gdp, Jordan or Libya?
- Jordan, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — export quantity, per unit of gdp between Jordan and Libya?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Libya?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Libya rank globally for sawnwood, non-coniferous — export quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Jordan ranks 131st and Libya ranks 132nd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.