What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — export value, per capita between New Zealand and Sri Lanka?

0 1000 USD per person, with New Zealand ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sri Lanka?

58 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

New Zealand vs Sri Lanka: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value, per capita

New Zealand

0.0001 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Sri Lanka

0.0001 1000 USD per person

in 2024

New Zealand rank

80th

Sri Lanka rank

83rd

Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value, per capita over time

New Zealand
Sri Lanka

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0001 1000 USD per person against 0.0001 1000 USD per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 1000 USD per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1967 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 80th and Sri Lanka ranks 83rd of 183 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	New Zealand	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	New Zealand
1970s	0.0003 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	New Zealand
1980s	0.0008 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	0.0008 1000 USD per person	New Zealand
1990s	0.0007 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	0.0007 1000 USD per person	New Zealand
2000s	0.0003 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	New Zealand
2010s	0.0004 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0.0003 1000 USD per person	New Zealand
2020s	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sawnwood, non-coniferous — export value, per capita, New Zealand or Sri Lanka?: New Zealand, at 0.0001 1000 USD per person against 0.0001 1000 USD per person in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — export value, per capita between New Zealand and Sri Lanka?: 0 1000 USD per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sri Lanka?: 58 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Sri Lanka rank globally for sawnwood, non-coniferous — export value, per capita?: New Zealand ranks 80th and Sri Lanka ranks 83rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Sri Lanka: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawnwood-non-coniferous-export-value-per-capita/new-zealand/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawnwood-non-coniferous-export-value-per-capita/new-zealand/sri-lanka/">New Zealand vs Sri Lanka: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value, per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 184 places, 7,533 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.