Costa Rica vs Guatemala: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
0.1194 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.0911 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
42nd
Guatemala rank
45th

Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Guatemala
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.1194 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0911 1000 USD per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0283 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.3 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 42nd and Guatemala ranks 45th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0026 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.005 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0024 1000 USD per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 0.0031 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0171 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.014 1000 USD per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.0145 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0055 1000 USD per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 0.0253 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0397 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0143 1000 USD per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.0254 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0753 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0499 1000 USD per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.1605 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0913 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0692 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.1393 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0709 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0684 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sawnwood, non-coniferous — export value, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Guatemala?
Costa Rica, at 0.1194 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0911 1000 USD per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — export value, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Guatemala?
0.0283 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Guatemala?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Guatemala rank globally for sawnwood, non-coniferous — export value, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 42nd and Guatemala ranks 45th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Guatemala: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawnwood-non-coniferous-export-value-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawnwood-non-coniferous-export-value-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/guatemala/">Costa Rica vs Guatemala: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 7,350 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.