Ghana vs Zambia: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity, per capita
Ghana
0 m3 per person
in 2024
Zambia
0 m3 per person
in 2024
Ghana rank
161st
Zambia rank
160th
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Ghana
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Ghana, a difference of 0 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 161st and Zambia ranks 160th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | Zambia |
| 2000s | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood, non-coniferous — import quantity, per capita, Ghana or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Ghana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — import quantity, per capita between Ghana and Zambia?
- 0 m3 per person, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Zambia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Ghana and Zambia rank globally for sawnwood, non-coniferous — import quantity, per capita?
- Ghana ranks 161st and Zambia ranks 160th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.