Lesotho vs New Zealand: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity, per capita
Lesotho
0.0062 m3 per person
in 2024
New Zealand
0.0057 m3 per person
in 2024
Lesotho rank
50th
New Zealand rank
52nd
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Lesotho
- New Zealand
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0.0062 m3 per person against 0.0057 m3 per person in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0005 m3 per person.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was New Zealand ahead.
Lesotho ranks 50th and New Zealand ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.001 m3 per person | 0.0051 m3 per person | 0.004 m3 per person | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.0019 m3 per person | 0.0073 m3 per person | 0.0054 m3 per person | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood, non-coniferous — import quantity, per capita, Lesotho or New Zealand?
- Lesotho, at 0.0062 m3 per person against 0.0057 m3 per person in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — import quantity, per capita between Lesotho and New Zealand?
- 0.0005 m3 per person, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and New Zealand?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Lesotho and New Zealand rank globally for sawnwood, non-coniferous — import quantity, per capita?
- Lesotho ranks 50th and New Zealand ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.