Morocco vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity, per square kilometre

Morocco
0.2854 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.3177 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco rank
72nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
69th

Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity, per square kilometre over time

  • Morocco
  • Trinidad and Tobago
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.3177 m3 per square kilometre against 0.2854 m3 per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 0.0323 m3 per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Morocco ranks 72nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 69th of 184 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0243 m3 per square kilometre 0.2491 m3 per square kilometre 0.2248 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0504 m3 per square kilometre 2.27 m3 per square kilometre 2.22 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.0883 m3 per square kilometre 12.36 m3 per square kilometre 12.27 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.1195 m3 per square kilometre 1.07 m3 per square kilometre 0.95 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.2144 m3 per square kilometre 0.7242 m3 per square kilometre 0.5097 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.1875 m3 per square kilometre 0.9265 m3 per square kilometre 0.739 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.2345 m3 per square kilometre 0.2739 m3 per square kilometre 0.0394 m3 per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sawnwood, non-coniferous — import quantity, per square kilometre, Morocco or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.3177 m3 per square kilometre against 0.2854 m3 per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — import quantity, per square kilometre between Morocco and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0323 m3 per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Morocco and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for sawnwood, non-coniferous — import quantity, per square kilometre?
Morocco ranks 72nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 69th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawnwood-non-coniferous-import-quantity-per-square-kilometre/morocco/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawnwood-non-coniferous-import-quantity-per-square-kilometre/morocco/trinidad-and-tobago/">Morocco vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity, per square kilometre
Unit
m3 per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,001 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.