Portugal vs Serbia: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity, per unit of GDP
Portugal
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Serbia
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Portugal rank
32nd
Serbia rank
31st
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- Portugal
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Portugal, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Portugal ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 31st of 180 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood, non-coniferous — import quantity, per unit of gdp, Portugal or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Portugal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — import quantity, per unit of gdp between Portugal and Serbia?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Portugal and Serbia rank globally for sawnwood, non-coniferous — import quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Portugal ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 31st of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.