What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — import value, per capita between Argentina and Brazil?

0 1000 USD per person, with Argentina ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Brazil?

59 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Argentina vs Brazil: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per capita

Argentina

0.0001 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Brazil

0.0001 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Argentina rank

130th

Brazil rank

132nd

Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per capita over time

Argentina
Brazil

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0.0001 1000 USD per person against 0.0001 1000 USD per person in Brazil, a difference of 0 1000 USD per person.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 130th and Brazil ranks 132nd of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 6 and Brazil in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Argentina	Brazil	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	Argentina
1970s	0.001 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0.001 1000 USD per person	Argentina
1980s	0.0008 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0.0007 1000 USD per person	Argentina
1990s	0.0008 1000 USD per person	0.0004 1000 USD per person	0.0004 1000 USD per person	Argentina
2000s	0.0006 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	0.0005 1000 USD per person	Argentina
2010s	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	Argentina
2020s	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sawnwood, non-coniferous — import value, per capita, Argentina or Brazil?: Argentina, at 0.0001 1000 USD per person against 0.0001 1000 USD per person in Brazil as of 2024.
What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — import value, per capita between Argentina and Brazil?: 0 1000 USD per person, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Brazil?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2024.
How do Argentina and Brazil rank globally for sawnwood, non-coniferous — import value, per capita?: Argentina ranks 130th and Brazil ranks 132nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Brazil: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawnwood-non-coniferous-import-value-per-capita/argentina/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawnwood-non-coniferous-import-value-per-capita/argentina/brazil/">Argentina vs Brazil: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 185 places, 8,185 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.